Comments for I am not the father

Average Rating starstarstarstarstar

Click here to add your own comments

Rating
starstarstarstarstar
If you have a child and are not in custody the courts own your ass.
by: Anonymous

I live in Sacramento and on our Fox News morning show had this exact issue came up a few months ago.
The attorney they had on the show (Ken Rosathal)
Said that yes in fact when there has been an emotional bond formed between a child and a person presumed to be the father even though a DNA test can prove that the person named as father was not, that he now must pay child support until the courts end his order meaning the child is 18 and graduated from High School or 19 or what every age they come up with base on if the child is going to an accredited College.(no end in site)
The justification for this action by the courts was the famous phrase, "WHAT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD"
Which basically means you are screwed and I'am the most powerful person that has ever been or ever will be in your life.(you know we've all seen Judge Judy and her ego).
Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe as long as a judge can use this phrase they can justify anything and do what ever they please.
Oh and if your wondering about the real or genetic father(he was having an affair with the wife before the end of her marriage to the WALLET, oh I mean the man with the emotional bond to the child) he is now in the childs life enjoying a emotional bond with his child getting off scott free of supplying any finacial responsablity.
This is a 100% true story, call Attorney Ken Rosenthal or Fox news in Sacramento if you don't believe such and injustice can be!!

Rating
starstarstarstarstar
Advice
by: Anonymous

I think you should take this case back to court and keep appealing it. I know of a father who was married to his wife and they had 5 children together. Or so he thought. They seperated and when she showed up pregnant with the 6th baby; he reqeusted a DNA test on the baby. The 6th baby turned out not to be his. The judge convinced him to get DNA on all the children. NONE of the children belonged to him. He didn't have to pay her anything.

I totally agree you need to take this one back to court.

Rating
starstarstarstarstar
Child Support needs to be revised
by:

You are not the father and a DNA test has proven that for you. Please don't let a case worker tell you what you are responsibile for! You are not responsible for the rest of the support.Take it back to court and bring your own lawyer.Don't just give in on behave of the rest of us real men out here caught between greed, bitter EX and money hungry child support agencies

Click here to add your own comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How? Simply click here to return to Child Support History.

Return to I am not the father.